This weekend you have read Hair et al., Noguera, and Steele. These are three different articles that all touch on the same topic of race and class. How do we, though, fit these articles into our understanding of how to work with your students?
As per usual, before 7 PM tomorrow (Monday, June 26) please respond to the following questions, and respond to at least one classmate's post. I am looking for thorough, thoughtful answers in order for you to receive credit for being "present" during this online class.
1. Taking the thrust of all three arguments (you may want to give an overview as to what they are), ultimately what is your argument about how race and class affect the students in your classroom? Remember, I'm not looking for specific names of students, but I am looking for an in-depth connection between the articles' arguments and your own teaching experience this past school year. Reflect on your own practice in a real, retrospective fashion.
2. Regarding Steele's stereotype threat, is this something you now suspect you have seen? Specifically working with ELL's, what are ways that educators, be it you or others, seek to reinforce certain stereotypes that may lead your students' academic achievement to suffer?
3. Based on your work this year, would this information have helped you better understand your students? If so, in what way, and if not, please explain. Knowing what you know now, how can this information help you work with your students, or possibly even better understand them regardless of what their background is, moving forward into your second year of teaching?
4. Finally, watch this speech by Lisa Delpit. Many of you were interested in culturally relevant teaching, and she's a rock star. Her work is very much worth exploring. After watching the video (it's about 20 minutes), how is she not just reinforcing what we are talking about, but also giving us active ways to apply this work to the classroom? How do you see yourself fitting in to her discussion of reaching students in the classroom?